Tuesday, September 16, 2014

The Lost World and the Mating Mind . . . Warning, Plot Spoilers


Maple White Land (The Lost World)

As many of you know, when I was young, I had an all-consuming passion for dinosaurs, possibly bordering on the pathological.  And, at some point during my dinosaur period I convinced my father and several older brothers to read to me in turns the original dinosaur novel:  Arthur Conan Doyle’s The Lost World.  Notwithstanding my childhood fixation, however, I find that I now recall more about the romance in the tale than the dinosaurs themselves.

So, with some plot spoilers, here is how this Edwardian tale of the heart unfolds.  As the story opens, we are witnessing young Edward Malone, an earnest enough Irish reporter for a London newspaper, just as he is proposing marriage to the girl of his dreams, Gladys Hungerton.

Almost before the proposal is out of his mouth, however, she flat-out rejects him.  She explains that, though he’s a good-looking chap, he possesses a defect in character.  When he presses her on the character issue, she spells out to him her ideal, which, sadly, he does not meet.

[A]bove all, he must be a man who could do, who could act, who could look Death in the face and have no fear of him, a man of great deeds and strange experiences. It is never a man that I should love, but always the glories he had won; for they would be reflected upon me.

When Malone asks her if he has any hope, she leaves the door open just a bit:  “Some day, perhaps, when you have won your place in the world, we shall talk it over again.”

Malone seizes onto this slender reed, and the next day goes straight to his editor and asks for the most dangerous assignment available.  Although his editor is concerned that Malone harbors some kind of hidden death wish, he eventually gives in and sends Malone to interview a certain Professor George Challenger.  Challenger had recently returned from a trip to South America, where he claims to have made astounding discoveries.  The only danger here, however – at least as far as the editor is concerned – is that Challenger has already assaulted several journalists asking for interviews.

Sure enough, he confronts Malone as well, but Malone, not without his own resources, is able to win him over, and Challenger reveals his discovery of dinosaurs in the Brazilian jungle.  Malone so charms the professor that Challenger invites him along on his next trip as a member of the press to verify his claims.

This is Malone’s dream come true.  He cares not one whit for prehistoric creatures, scientific discoveries or global exploration – but here’s his chance to make himself worthy of Gladys in a spectacular fashion.

So, as is chronicled elsewhere, Malone accompanies Challenger to South America along with two others: Professor Summerlee, a scientist sufficiently qualified to confirm or deny the genuineness of Challenger’s claims, and Lord John Roxton, an adventurer who knows the Amazon basin and several years earlier helped end slavery by robber barons in South America.

As we now know, Malone in the course of this expedition, encounters strange beasts, has harrowing adventures and from time to time even distinguishes himself.  But the point here is that Malone never would have gone on this trip and never would have written the book (under the alias of Doyle, of course) had Gladys not insisted that he prove himself.

Malone, as it happens, returns home safe and sound, but during the whole time he was away he never heard from Gladys.  Indeed, no message even awaits him when he arrives at Southampton.

Undeterred, Malone goes straight away to see his love, looking forward with anticipation to “the open arms, the smiling face, the words of praise for her man who had risked his life to humor her whim.”  But, he’s stopped dead in his tracks when they meet and he is in short order introduced to Mr. Potts, Gladys’ new husband:

How absurd life is! I found myself mechanically bowing and shaking hands with a little ginger-haired man who was coiled up in the deep arm-chair which had once been sacred to my own use.

Gladys apologizes for abandoning Malone, but then delivers the deepest cut,  “But it [Malone’s feeling for her] couldn't have been so very deep, could it, if you could go off to the other end of the world and leave me here alone?”

Malone turns to leave in despair but before he goes he confronts this Potts fellow:
        
"Will you answer a question?" I asked.

"Well, within reason," said he.

"How did you do it? Have you searched for hidden treasure, or discovered a pole, or done time on a pirate, or flown the Channel, or what? Where is the glamour of romance? How did you get it?"

He stared at me with a hopeless expression upon his vacuous, good-natured, scrubby little face.

"Don't you think all this is a little too personal?" he said.

"Well, just one question," I cried. "What are you? What is your profession?"

"I am a solicitor's clerk," said he. "Second man at Johnson and Merivale's, 41 Chancery Lane."

"Good-night!" said I, and vanished, like all disconsolate and broken-hearted heroes, into the darkness, with grief and rage and laughter all simmering within me like a boiling pot.

But the story does not end quite yet.  There is one last scene.  A few days later, Lord Roxton invites his three fellow travelers to dinner, where he reveals that the sample of blue clay he collected on the dinosaur plateau and had so carefully preserved contained diamonds –- as he suspected.    He had said nothing, however, until he was certain of his find.  Of course, he would split the gems four ways equally, and they were now all fabulously wealthy.

The discussion turns to what they might now do with their newly acquired wealth.  Challenger thinks he will establish a museum; Summerlee would leave teaching and devote all his time to research.  Roxton, who has already given the matter some thought, wants to mount another expedition to the Brazilian jungle and the lost world.  Roxton then turns to Malone.

“As to you, young fellah, you, of course, will spend yours in gettin' married."

"Not just yet," said I, with a rueful smile. "I think, if you will have me, that I would rather go with you."

And then the final line of the book:  “Lord Roxton said nothing, but a brown hand was stretched out to me across the table.”

*  *  *

You might chalk up these last scenes as some kind of endorsement of the male club or a comment on the general unreliability and flightiness of women. These days, however, I can’t think about Doyle’s book without also thinking of Geoffrey Millers’ The Mating Mind.  I prefer to look at it this way:  men do all kinds of things to woo women, and sometimes it works out and sometimes it doesn’t.  But, in any event, the achievement remains, and we find that the entire species benefits. 

As we know, the human brain is much more powerful than it needs to be for us to survive.  The human species would have managed without Einstein's science, Shakespeare’s plays or Beethoven's symphonies. On the other hand, these are precisely the kind of things that the human brain does so well, and much better than other animal brains.  As Miller suggests, most of human culture – arts, morality, sports, science, music, scholarship – have no real evolutionary advantage, but may have arisen as an unintended consequence from men’s competition for women, and from women generally selecting the best, brightest and most interesting among their suitors.  According to Miller, if women hadn’t been selecting the cleverest young men for thousands of years, we’d be still small-brained bi-pedaled primates roaming the African savannahs.

Of course, Gladys did not select Malone despite all his efforts.  But Malone should not be too downhearted. Gladys, as we know, was not quite the woman Malone imagined her to be and was certainly not worthy of his ardor.  Beyond that, he’s now headed down a road that she would never recognize, let alone follow.  He’s a decent enough fellow (and even Gladys conceded that he was good-looking) and may yet find the right woman, a Jane Goodall of the dinosaurs, perhaps.  In any event, his story is sort of humankind’s history in miniature.  We started off just trying to impress women and ended up distinguishing ourselves in all sorts of amazing ways.


The one and only KD Lang pretty much sums it up right here:                          
  

Friday, September 12, 2014

Printing Money

Nothing reminds me more of printing money in your basement than an iPhone launch. Of course, it would need to be a basement the size of the Pentagon with thousands of intricate plans, parts, and paints coming from all over the world at the same time.

Oh, and perhaps you would need to book every cargo flight out of the country for the next 2 weeks.

Thursday, August 28, 2014

The End of Allergies

Let's get down to the nitty gritty, practical. No, not whether or not Taylor Swift's new "Shake It Off" outtakes proves she hates running, but how to raise children or yourself, for that matter.

The strangest, most dramatic change in human health (other than the virtual elimination of diseases such as small pox, polio, measles, diphtheria) is the meteoric rise in allergies. How does thousands of years of evolution break down in 10 years? I talked with a parent recently who said that all school parties have been eliminated because so many kids have life threatening food allergies. No more cupcakes, or anything, on Valentine's Day, or any holiday. Food allergies have increased about 50% in children since 1997—50%! How did this happen?

I have changed my thinking, as I often do, as to the principle causes of this phenomenon. But currently I am leaning more and more toward the "End of Eternity" theme as written by Isaac Asimov. I'll summarize it this way, by concentrating on the safety of humanity, humanity was being destroyed. This article, entitled A Gut Microbe That Stops Food Allergies is a study (yes, another one) that lends some evidence that bad things have to happen to us in order to make us stronger. Safety through antibiotics use or through restrictive (parental) fears may be detrimental to children (or ourselves).

Wednesday, August 20, 2014

Roman History Buffs Rejoice!

This is one of the cooler things I have com across on the interwebs: http://www.vox.com/2014/8/19/5942585/40-maps-that-explain-the-roman-empire

Sunday, August 17, 2014

Poetry Sunday: "Poetry is the supreme fiction"

As some of you know, for approaching two years I have been writing a poem. Yes, one poem. Among the many things I have learned is that indeed, “Poetry is the supreme fiction.” Here are some parts of poems…no they are the entire poems, but appear as scraps. They were all written by the same talented person. Whether the talent is reflected in the poetry, I leave up to the reader.


“While questing once in noble wood of grey Medieval pine 
I came upon a tomb rain-slick’d, rubbed-cool ethereal;
It’s inscription long vanished. Yet still within its melancholy fissures”

“The painter’s brush touched the inchoate face by ends of nimble bristles
And with their blush of first color, rendered her lifeless cheek living.”

“E’en the most gifted bard’s rhyme can only sing
But to the lack of her and all she isn’t!
His tongue doth. .  .”

(Then there’s a poem, but we might want to start on the soup since it’s 46 stanzas.)
“A moist, black ash dampens the filth of dung-dark rat’s nest
And mingles with the thick scent of wood rot
While the lark song of a guttersnipe. . .”

(How’s our darling Agatha?)
“Twas first light when I saw her face upon the heath,
And hence did I return day-by-day, entranced,
Tho’ vinegar did brine my heart, never. . .”
(Very good. I’m going to stop you there because the alarm has sounded, but remember where 
we left off because I insist you finish later.)

“Tis oft’-remarked, no single, falling-flake does any other
In its pure and perfect form. . .”

“‘If this do be me end, farewell!’ cried the wounded piper-boy,
Whilst the muskets cracked and yeomen roared ‘Hurrah!’
And the ramparts fell.
‘Methinks me breathes me last, me fears¡’ said he
(Holy shit! You got him! Well done, Zero!)

“Whence came these two radiant, celestial brothers,
United, for an instant, as they crossed the stratosphere of our starry window?
One from the East and one from the West.”
(Very good.

Don’t flirt with her.)

Tuesday, August 12, 2014

Government, Corporate Personhood, and the Web

The idea of corporate personhood and that government represents persons, has led to some strange behavior. One great byproduct of "all knowledge is on the Web" is that people, whether corporations or not, may, through extraordinary efforts in organizing data, be exposed to meaningful information.

Here is a browser plug-in that has the potential for stirring the pot.
(Of course, not much has happened with my last post on potential policy changing software.)

Sunday, July 27, 2014

Some Philosophy Podcasts

Jim was a gracious host during my few days in Mt. Lebo last month, and between grocery shopping and travels around Pittsburgh we got to talking a bit about philosophy and online resources for its study. I'd promised to share some podcasts that I've found interesting, so I thought I'd post them here for those who might also be interested.

The first is the Partially Examined Life, which just posted an interview with Michael Sandel, the professor behind Harvard's popular "Justice" class, one that has been featured on this blog (I believe).

http://www.partiallyexaminedlife.com/

And the second is called Entitled Opinions with Robert Harrison, of the Italian Department at Stanford. He's a Dante scholar and, as best as I can tell, a kind of Catholic Heideggerian. I've especially enjoyed his interviews with Thomas Sheehan on the historical Jesus and on various continental philosophers. His favorite philosopher of the 20th Century: Hannah Arendt.

http://web.stanford.edu/dept/fren-ital/opinions/

He also recently published a criticism of the culture of Silicon Valley in the New York Review of Books (low hanging fruit, but still a good read):

http://www.nybooks.com/blogs/nyrblog/2014/jul/17/children-silicon-valley/

I'd be interested to hear of other resources visitors here have found interesting.

Cheers.

Mike (the younger)

Thursday, July 24, 2014

Mental Health Break -- Louis Prima


We celebrated the Fourth of July this year by attending an outdoor concert given by the Harrisburg symphony orchestra. As we approached the end of the concert, the conductor -- who had commented on his musical selections thoughout the evening -- declared that he has gotten sick and tired of July 4th concerts always concluding with the 1812 Overture.   He said that he never understood what a musical piece about a victory of the Russian Imperial Army over the French was doing in a celebration about American independence. So, this time, he replaced the 1812 Overture with this American classic, written by Louis Prima and made famous by Benny Goodman.   What music better captures the urgency and pandemonium of American life?

Note: the video is from the 1993 movie Swing Kids.  Despite the presence of Robert Sean Leonard, the movie got mixed reviews at best.  But it's a good enough backdrop for one tremendous song. By the way, this was released in 1936.  Mom would have been 17.



Wednesday, July 2, 2014

Out of the Mouths of Our Children...

Ellen tells this story about when she was in Prague studying. While there, she was lucky enough to be able to see a qualifying match for the 2012 European Championship between Scotland and the Czech Republic. Days before the game, Prague was invaded by what appeared to be thousands of Scottish soccer fans who more or less took over the city. Ellen learned that these folk called themselves the Tartan Army and followed the team around the world attending matches.  They were a good-natured and amazingly exuberant lot, and inhibited is not a word that would naturally spring to mind to describe them.  While the Scots were in Prague, they generally hung out, held parades in full Scottish regalia and partied a lot.  She ended up falling in with one group and had a pretty boisterous night in one of the local pubs (even though she had supported the hometown team).

Anyway, perhaps you have seen Ann Coulter's recent piece that decries the current American passion for soccer sparked by our team's modest success in Brazil.  AMERICA'S FAVORITE NATIONAL PASTIME: HATING SOCCER.  So, knowing Ellen's past association with soccer, I shared with her a little of Coulter's column today by email. Here’s the discussion:
Me:
Finally, I've got the latest from Ann Coulter on the recent American enthusiasm for soccer.  Coulter writes:  "I've held off on writing about soccer for a decade — or about the length of the average soccer game — so as not to offend anyone. But enough is enough.  Any growing interest in soccer can only be a sign of the nation's moral decay.”  How do you think your Tartan Army would respond to this?
Ellen:
Haha, the Tartan army wouldn't pay her any mind. They're too busy getting drunk in public and dancing on tables. We should all probably follow their lead.
Out of the mouths of our children comes truth and wisdom.

Ellen and HWS friend with two footsoldiers in the Tartan Army

We are all concerned about reality, right?

The author's science is undoubtably stronger than his philosophy, but this article is an interesting, if incremental, read.

Wednesday, June 25, 2014

Wednesday, June 18, 2014

Trinity Sunday



This past Sunday was Trinity Sunday.  There was a time when it seemed that every Trinity Sunday sermon began with some form of the story originally told by Jacobus de Varagine in his book on the lives of saints, the Golden Legend.  The book was written around 1260, and was immensely popular in the late Middle Ages.  From 1470 to 1530 it was the most frequently printed book in Europe.The Trinity Sunday story is about St Augustine of Hippo, who apparently spent much time pondering the Trinity.  I let Jacobus take up the tale:
As Augustine went by the sea-side in Africa, studying on the Trinity, he found by the sea-side a little child which had made a little pit in the sand, and in his hand a little spoon. And with the spoon he took out water of the large sea and poured it into the pit.
And when St. Augustine beheld him he marveled, and demanded him what he did. And he answered and said, ‘I will lade out and bring all this water of the sea into this pit.’
‘What?’ said he, “‘it is impossible, how may it be done, sith the sea is so great and large, and thy pit and spoon so little?’
‘Yes, forsooth,’ said he, ‘I shall lightlier and sooner draw all the water of the sea and bring it into this pit than thou shalt bring the mystery of the Trinity and His Divinity into thy little understanding as to the regard thereof; for the Mystery of the Trinity is greater and larger to the comparison of thy wit and brain than is this great sea unto this little pit.’
And therewith the child vanished away.
































My reaction to this story these days is that, well, apparently the Trinity is like just about everything else in the universe. It seems that almost any aspect of reality may be greater and larger than our wit and brain.

We’re seeing more clearly that we do not “know” anything as it is.  Instead, we see reality as our brains permit.  Neuroscientist David Eagleman goes so far as to say:  You're not perceiving what's out there. You're perceiving whatever your brain tells you.”  For example, our eyes are sensitive to a very narrow band of frequencies within an enormous range of the total frequencies of the electromagnetic spectrum. Visible light that registers on our retina is but one millionth of one percent of the entire spectrum.  Who’s to say what other aspects of reality our mind and senses filter out?  “Now my own suspicion,” says geneticist J.B.S. Haldane, “is that the Universe is not only queerer than we suppose, but queerer than we can suppose.”

The physicists see this most acutely.  According to Richard Feynman, “In physics the truth is rarely perfectly clear, and that is certainly universally the case in human affairs. Hence, what is not surrounded by uncertainty cannot be the truth.” 

Niels Bohr questions whether the “truth” should even be the goal:  “There is no quantum world. There is only an abstract quantum physical description. It is wrong to think that the task of physics is to find out how nature is. Physics concerns what we can say about Nature.”   Thus, “Physics is to be regarded not so much as the study of something a priori given, but rather as the development of methods of ordering and surveying human experience.”  Indeed, the physicist is more of a poet than anything.   “We must be clear that when it comes to atoms, language can be used only as in poetry. The poet, too, is not nearly so concerned with describing facts as with creating images and establishing mental connections.”

As St. Paul says, “we see through a glass, darkly.”  The best that scientists can do is to find language that illuminates the hints they gather from the universe and creates a cohesive picture.   As Bohr says, “Our task is not to penetrate into the essence of things, the meaning of which we don't know anyway, but rather to develop concepts which allow us to talk in a productive way about phenomena in nature."

Of course, my man, Nicholas of Cusa, saw all this back in 1440, long before anyone had encountered the anomalies of the atom.

Hence, regarding truth, it is evident that we do not know anything other than the following: viz., that we know truth not to be precisely comprehensible as it is. For truth may be likened unto the most absolute necessity (which cannot be either something more or something less than it is), and our intellect may be likened unto possibility. Therefore, the quiddity of things, which is the truth of beings, is unattainable in its purity; though it is sought by all philosophers, it is found by no one as it is. And the more deeply we are instructed in this ignorance, the closer we approach to truth.

Happy Trinity Sunday!


Monday, June 2, 2014

A tree in the woods

There is a tree growing in the woods somewhere so "off the beaten path" that no one has ever seen or experienced it. Does that tree exist? Similar to the old "tree falls in the woods" query, most everyone would confidently say that of course it exists. Now let me add this: Not only is the tree itself not perceived but in any ecological study or data collection, the tree exerts no perceived influence. In other words our whole world and universe functions as if the tree does not exist. The tree has no perceived influence. Now you say, "Well, if it tastes like nothing, smells like nothing, it is nothing. What you just described is not a tree at all but nothing." And I say, "Just so." However, did we not now just describe a tree as something that needs to be perceived for it to exist?

(I was researching something else and this popped into my head, and I thought it might make a nice discussion. On this blog we have mentioned George Berkeley's philosophy and Ronald Knox's limericks, but we haven't much discussed different types of existence (re: a unicorn exists in some manner or we wouldn't use the word). Also, perhaps one area to explore is that the house of being (language) is not so well constructed—more like the "shack of being." Anyway, I really have no other thoughts, but would like to learn what others think. Perhaps it is just a nonsense question, …or perceived as such.)

Tuesday, May 27, 2014

It's been awhile.

Hey all.

Now I know you are probably wondering about what I am up to now, where I've been, what I've been doing, and if not and of those questions then who am I and why do I share your last name.

I know, it's been awhile.

But I am not here to talk about me, there will come a time and a place and frankly here, now, is neither. I am here to talk about a person near and dear to all our lives. The person who has pushed us to be better in every aspect of ourselves. I think this person needs to be especially recognized since mother's day just passed and they have been a mother to us all.

Of course, I am talking about Bill Murray.

The iconic, quirky, funny-man that is Bill Murray. Obviously, we all love his movies. That's a given. But I also love him for his mythos. Bill Murray has become a spook story told throughout the country. Tales of him showing up in expected places, say for example underneath your chair at the movie theatre, doing some ridiculous stunt and then muttering the ever taunting phrase "No one will ever believe you." has become a never ending internet meme. I remember just a few years ago Bill Murray was supposedly going through Philadelphia and he promised he would stop at anyones house if they had karaoke going and had his name on a sign outside. I remember every house, every bar, every cardboard box was emblazoned with Bill Murray. His mythos is mysterious and ever sage-like, with him showing up and taking a lucky man or woman on crazy adventures through out the city with the night only ending with life advice from the one and only.

So here's the thing. I love Bill Murray, and while I wanted to believe all these things I just believed they were over zealous fans spreading the idea of Bill. Until today. Today my facebook newsfeed trended with Bill Murray, crashing a bachelor party and giving life advice to the groom and to all those in attendance. Maybe this doesn't match up to the stories I've been told. The stories told only in hushed voices in the back of dark bars by strangers with hidden faces. But, to me, this gives me hope that it is all true.

If you have never heard Bill Murray story here are a few:

Years ago, I left my laptop open at a Starbucks while I left to get my drink. When I returned, Bill Murray was sitting in front of my screen tapping away on the keyboard. I looked over his shoulder as he anonymously posted a number of stories regarding encounters with himself. They ranged from tackling others, stealing food and other fun oddities. When he finished, he closed my laptop, stood up, and looked me in the eye. Then he said, “No one will ever believe you” and walked away.

----


Bill Murray came in and ordered a basket of Suicidal wings and a scotch, neat. He was carrying a manuscript under his arm, which he laid on the seat next to him. I wanted to say hello but I didn’t want to seem starstruck so I just smiled and waved my drink at him.
As the night progressed, he ordered more drinks and more wings. At some point, as is usually the case at DTH, with his hands covered in wing sauce, Bill Murray ran out of napkins. After a couple of halfhearted attempts at getting the bartender’s attention, Mr. Murray began tearing pages off the top of the manuscript next to him and using them to wipe his hands. Odd, but not altogether crazy.
After a few drinks of my own, I finally mustered the courage to approach him and offer to buy him a round. Before I could get the words out of my mouth, however, Mr. Murray grabbed me by my wrist, pulled me towards him and said “You’ve got something…a bit of schmutz right…there.” He then tore a page off the top of that manuscript and wiped something off the corner of my mouth.
I thanked him and unsure of what to say after that, I cast my eyes towards the pile of crumpled-up pages and napkins on the bar beside us. It was then that a watermark on each page caught my eye: “Ghostbusters 3: Back In Business.”
Bill must’ve seen a change of expression on my face because at this point, he pulled me closer, leaned over and whispered in my ear “No one will ever believe you.
----
Some can be more ridiculous than others.
And Finally


Bill Murray's Response from GQ magazine when asked about this phenomenon:
[long pause] I know. I know, I know, I know. I've heard about that from a lot of people. A lot of people. I don't know what to say. There's probably a really appropriate thing to say. Something exactly and just perfectly right. [long beat, and then he breaks into a huge grin] But by God, it sounds crazy, doesn't it? Just so crazy and unlikely and unusual?
So to finish Bill Murray is great with his fans and creating this mythos. If I could choose one person to live forever with no adverse affects it would be Bill Murray. Stories are a bound, pictures are few and movies... well I've only ever found one.... or two.
Below is the movie of the bachelor party in question:

Wednesday, May 21, 2014

Saturday, May 17, 2014

Even our Best Friends Can Let Us Down

The linked article recently published in the New Yorker, Is Heidegger Contaminated by Nazism?, really needs no comment, except a personal one.   It captures for me a lot about why I loved studying Heidegger so much in my undergraduate days, along with my profound disappointment at his anti-semitism.  And, perhaps, there is also an object lesson here.    As the article notes, philosophy professor Peter Trawny said this about Heidegger's anti-semitism: “The problem is not just that I’m morally shocked—it’s also a problem that he is so dumb.”  It seems that no amount of brilliance in one area can innoculate us against stupity in another.